Microscope Matt - I
Science brain teasers require understanding of the physical or biological world and the laws that govern it.
Microscope Matt is an employee for a top-notch science company.
Today, he had signed up to use the big scanning electron microscope for the first time. He had received so much training and taken many classes to be privileged to use this machine.
He had prepared a sample of an ant to be examined. Matt put the ant on the plate, and activated the machine. He took a look at the monitor, and saw a red fire ant, in the process eating what appeared to be a plant leaf - exactly what he had prepared.
Matt was positive that someone was pulling a prank on him. He checked the cables from the monitor and, sure enough, they didn't connect to the microscope.
How did Microscope Matt know he was being tricked?
HintWhat kind of microscope?
Hide
Answer
The image of the ant appeared in color - something an ELECTRON microscope cannot show. Only light microscopes can show color.
Note - Images CAN be colored afterwards.
Hide
Comments
ruroken   
Sep 04, 2006
| I had a different answer, but it was still a good teaser! |
MattM462   
Sep 04, 2006
| Just curious, what was your answer? |
ruroken   
Sep 04, 2006
| Well, electron scanning microscopes have to have the specimen it's examining in a vacuum because the electrons will bounce off of anything, including air. So electron scanning microscopes can't be used to study live specimens. Or am I confusing it with something else? |
scallio   
Sep 05, 2006
| I didn't find this to be a very interesting teaser, but I have to admit I am not a fan of biology!  |
MattM462   
Sep 05, 2006
| I never said the ant was alive...
Just wait for Microscope Matt - II  |
jazzmusician46   
Sep 05, 2006
| I haven't got a scientific bone in my body, but I love reading these science teasers. Thanks.  |
soccerfreak   
Sep 05, 2006
| clever
 |
ruroken   
Sep 05, 2006
| Thanks Matt! |
Pizzazz2u   
Sep 06, 2006
| I had always thought your image would be unrecognizable, if you used the microscope mentioned. Besides, your mention of lack of color, too. Still, a good one to get your mind wondering about the answer.  |
MMSMustang   
Sep 17, 2006
| ruroken was right! you sadi it was in the PROCESS of eating and non-living things do not eat so technaclly, ruroken was right |
MattM462   
Sep 21, 2006
| I meant that he had a leaf halfway in his mouth... The ant wasn't moving... |
Herman 
Sep 28, 2006
| Gimme a break, you've got to be kidding me!! First of all, changing your problem: in the process. Secondly, why the heck would someone use an electron microscope to look at an ant. Electron microscopes blow up images a ton, way too much to even see an ant eating a leaf, whether the ant be alive or dead. Comon Dumb. |
Herman 
Sep 28, 2006
| Gimme a break, you've got to be kidding me!! First of all, changing your problem: in the process. Secondly, why the heck would someone use an electron microscope to look at an ant. Electron microscopes blow up images a ton, way too much to even see an ant eating a leaf, whether the ant be alive or dead. Comon Dumb. |
marschie   
Oct 12, 2006
| The ant would be unrecognizable since an electron microscope magnifies so much that cells themselves might be unrecognizable. You would be able to see the hairs on the ant's legs filling up the field. Poor answer, poor teaser.  |
MattM462   
Oct 13, 2006
| My science book showed a picture of an ant holding a microchip...  |
eamon  
Oct 19, 2006
| Back to the drawing board.  |
shdwhawk   
Oct 31, 2006
| Duh, electon microscopes are use to see CELLS, how is it possible to see the image of the ant of leaf?  |
(user deleted)
Jan 14, 2007
| I have actually used an Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and I can tell you that you can use it to look at anything that a light microscope can see. The only difference is that you can blow things up to an incredible magnification, but you don't have too. If you only want to blow it up to say 250x instead of 250 000x, then you can. And here is a picture of an ant using an SEM for those that would argue with me just for the sake of argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ant_SEM.jpg
I do agree that my answer was not as a result of the colour of the image, but the fact it was eating. Anything being viewed on the SEM will be dead due to it being in a vacuum. The colour was a misrepresentation because I just assumed you were stating the type of ant, not the fact that you could see it was red. |
vikingboy   
Jan 20, 2007
| yep, I'm with dropzone.
Since you stated that you knew what you were supposed to be looking at, you would have known that it was a red fire ant. |
reptile5000   
Jun 01, 2007
| DropZone, your link does not connect (at least not anymore) |
CatsAreCute  
Jan 17, 2008
| How would he be able to tell that the ant was eating?! With an electron microscope!!  |
MattM462   
Jan 17, 2008
| Thanks, dropzone.  |
bradon182001   
Dec 19, 2010
| Well done teaser. Thanks for posting. |
Back to Top
| |
|