Brain Teasers
Brain Teasers Trivia Mentalrobics Games Community
Personal Links
Your Friends
Your Watchlist
Public Forums
Writing Teasers
Teaser Answers
Ask a Question
The Human Mind
Trivia and Quizzes
New? Start Here!

General Discussion
Current Events

Bugs & Requests

High Scorers
High Karma
More Community
Teaser Comments
Trivia Comments

User Rankings
Search for User
Add to Google delicious Add to

More ways to get Braingle...

Braingle Time
8:43 am

Public Forums >> Games >>

Forum Rules View Watchlist Post Reply


Yes5 (your vote)
Sure, but I won't join.0
 Total Votes:5

Zelda 4 evar.
Posts: 1849

new Posted: 09:31AM Nov 17, 2013

You guys all know my WWG series, Harry Potter House Game, right? Should I make a WTB version?

They say people aren't real. DP doubly so.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki

Posts: 216

new Posted: 12:49PM Nov 17, 2013

I think you'd have to modify the rules a bit. (Because there's only 2 untrustworthy roles. Thus, only 2 Slytherins. Maybe you can make another role in the game that requires that player to betray the rest of the team?)

Edit: Pressed the post button before I was done. I'd love to join it, but I suggest making it a private game, because your current game has many inactives. You'll probably have to do a background check too to see if they're active enough to play, but you don't have to because the people that don't ask are likely the ones who don't put much effort into games while the ones who ask likely really want to play your game and are likely to be active.

---This message was edited on 12:52PM Nov 17, 2013---

Differences of habit and language are nothing at all if our aims are identical and our hearts are open. ~Albus Dumbledore
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki

Zelda 4 evar.
Posts: 1849

new Posted: 08:32PM Nov 17, 2013

Um, my game only has 4 inactives.

They say people aren't real. DP doubly so.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki

Simulposter Extraordinaire
Posts: 614

new Posted: 07:41AM Nov 18, 2013

I'd say that four is entirely too many. I've been on the losing side of a WWG game due to an inactive wolf (he posted once per round to say that he wouldn't have time to post/vote), and that player is still infamous for it among the group of folks I regularly play with. My point is simply that it only takes one inactive to ruin something good.

Note: I was among the humans.

---This message was edited on 07:41AM Nov 18, 2013---
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    


Public Forums >> Games >>

! Access Restricted

You'll need to create an account and sign in before you can post messages.

Users in Chat : dangerouspie101 

Online Now: 9 users and 696 guests

Copyright © 1999-2014 | Updates | FAQ | RSS | Widgets | Links | Green | Subscribe | Contact | Privacy | Conditions | Advertise

Custom Search

Sign In A Create a free account