| Author | Message |
HarryPutter 

Posts: 2931
|
Posted: 11:04AM Oct 31, 2011 |
|
The U.N.-declared landmark underscores the challenges faced by many countries in providing for the growing numbers of people on an already over stretched and crowded planet.
...
With the world's population more than doubling over the last half century, basics like food and water are under more strain than ever, say experts, and providing for an additional 2-3 billion people in the next 50 years is a serious worry.
Water usage is set to increase by 50 percent between 2007 and 2025 in developing nations, while food security remains a challenge with 925 million people going hungry.
To feed the two billion more mouths predicted by 2050, food production will have to increase by 70 percent, the U.N.'s Food and Agricultural Organisation says. But climate change may be the greatest impediment to meeting this target, say experts.
Growing numbers of people on earth is also resulting in rapid urbanisation, placing serious strains on towns and cities as migrants move from poor rural areas to richer urban centres.
...
reuters
So 7 billion...
How will we survive?
---This message was edited on 11:04AM Oct 31, 2011---
If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage) |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
caberet 

We are Stardust! Posts: 358
|
Posted: 12:11PM Oct 31, 2011 |
|
7,000,000,000 is indeed a large number. Very large number when you consider that it's human beings that we're talking about. Critters that use massive amounts of natural materials. With oil becoming increasing scarce in the rather near future, things should get interesting.
Perhaps it's time to build solar photoelectric roads, start hanging up our clothes and generally living with less. Or more likely, it's business as usual until it's suddenly way too late...
"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
maybenot 

Posts: 37
|
Posted: 03:46PM Oct 31, 2011 |
|
Breathingearth.net
OKAY, so I'm aware that this site is only a simulation, but if anyone wants to look at it and the population hits 7bill, can you PLEASE try to get a screenshot and send it to me. I want it so bad for my junior year scrapbook.
Deception and perfection are wonderful traits, one will breed love, the other hate. |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
HarryPutter 

Posts: 2931
|
Posted: 06:35PM Nov 1, 2011 |
|
Thanks for the link mayb. Interesting site
The vast majority of the population growth comes from people who really shouldn't be having kids.
If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage) |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
shawneeo 

Posts: 7951
|
Posted: 08:06PM Nov 2, 2011 |
|
uh oh! Harry, that's a powder keg of a statement! But I'm not gonna touch it! 
We have to either start doing all the things we know we should do, like research and development of Solar, other renewable energies, zero population growth, more planned cities with less cars and more mass transport, and so on and on... or, just like cab said, it will suddenly be too late... That's my belief on the matter. We know we can do all these things, we have the intelligence, but will we, as one human race, do it?
Life... can be so many things... how can anyone ever think they are RIGHT? HAhahahahahahaha!!!!! |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
Shadows  

Posts: 4680
|
Posted: 08:35PM Nov 2, 2011 |
|
HarryPutter wrote: The vast majority of the population growth comes from people who really shouldn't be having kids. 
I'm not saying that only educated people should have kids, but this is rather interesting. Take a look.
"Time's rushing by me like the wind / Gotta grab each moment that I can / 'Cause I'm never gonna feel like this again" |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
HarryPutter 

Posts: 2931
|
Posted: 10:04PM Nov 2, 2011 |
|
Not only that, look at fertility rates Worldwide...
source
The impoverished countries are the ones with the highest fertility rates.
If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage) |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
Mathgeek007 

Pi Guy Posts: 1431
|
Posted: 10:08AM Nov 3, 2011 |
|
Something is drastically wrong here...
Parents are supposed to "protect" their kids, but there's a real distinction between protection and unrealistically keeping children away from reality. - Life_Sucks --- One of my teasers was featured as the Teaser of the Day! :D Sept. 18 2011 :D YAY! |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
spud 

Posts: 1135
|
Posted: 11:39PM Nov 3, 2011 |
|
I agree there is something wrong there, most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids and then al of the poor countries are highlighted with at least 4-6 kids!!!
Random.
Visit my wiki and PM me a message for my Guestbook and you will be on my friends list A.S.A.P!!! :) |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
Steve1973 

Posts: 715
|
Posted: 01:01AM Nov 4, 2011 |
|
spud wrote: I agree there is something wrong there, most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids and then al of the poor countries are highlighted with at least 4-6 kids!!!
Random.
Not really. Most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids, who almost always survive; the poor countries who have 4-6 kids often have a mortality rate that's out the roof. If 2/3 of all children die before they become an adult, you need to give birth to 3-6 children to have 1 or 2 survivors to continue on the species.
Generally speaking, countries with a high birth rate are also countries with a high mortality rate, and with a lower life expectancy.
Like to chat? Share links? Don't want to be told, it's a No-No to do so? Then come join us in THE REAL GENERAL DISCUSSION talkbox -- where you can post with only the lightest of moderation. |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
spud 

Posts: 1135
|
Posted: 01:19AM Nov 4, 2011 |
|
That is a good point but the kids in the wealthy countries can actually be looked after having a good education, good pay and a good health where as in the poor countries the adults are having lots of kids, making it hard on them and then the kids aren't surviving, not getting a good education and can't get a good pay, but if they adults in the poor countries had fewer kids their kids would have a better chance of surviving and getting a better education.
Visit my wiki and PM me a message for my Guestbook and you will be on my friends list A.S.A.P!!! :) |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
LogicalRoger 

Posts: 2444
|
Posted: 02:05AM Nov 4, 2011 |
|
but if they adults in the poor countries had fewer kids their kids would have a better chance of surviving and getting a better education. I don't know if that's true. In certain countries this may make sense, but in others where, as Steve has pointed out, there is a high mortality rate, it would not mean that that individual has better chances. More than not, this would just kill off families as if a family only has a few children they are more likely to all die by the odds than one lucky one survive.
Actually, compare Harry's chart with the following to show that birth rates isn't all there is to population. There are plenty that had lots of kids on Harry's map that have low populations on this one and vice versa:
World Population Map
While I do agree that people should not have multiple children unless they have the means to support them, I wouldn't want to deny people from doing so either. If we did that, then that might seem as if we were encouraging the wealthy to have an evolutionary leg up (as if they don't already have one in personal health). While it might seem better to have people who can support themselves, over time the wealthy children would likely become poorer as usual, due to the lack of monetary resources to support an elite majority. And if not, then that would just limit culture too much, in my opinion.
|
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
caberet 

We are Stardust! Posts: 358
|
Posted: 06:12AM Nov 4, 2011 |
|
It also takes money and resources to avoid pregnancy. If certain populations have little access to basics such as enough food, clean water and meds, odds are they don't have readily available contraceptives.
"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
snappytom

Posts: 4351
|
Posted: 01:05AM Nov 5, 2011 |
|
Humans interfere too much.
Let mother nature take care of things.
Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap! |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
caberet 

We are Stardust! Posts: 358
|
Posted: 08:25AM Nov 5, 2011 |
|
snappytom wrote: Humans interfere too much.
Let mother nature take care of things. Following with what I think you're saying would mean that next time people are sick that they shouldn't go to the doctor? Broken arms shouldn't be set, pneumonia should be allowed to kill rather than be treated with antibiotics, etc? If so, I don't see that happening anywhere except where people lack the resources for treatment.
It sounds well and good to espouse ideals like letting mother nature/god/whatever be in charge, but when trouble hits us or our loved ones, we are going to interfere!
---This message was edited on 10:44AM Nov 5, 2011---
"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
snappytom

Posts: 4351
|
Posted: 11:38AM Nov 5, 2011 |
|
Not necessarily. There are living wills.
And hopefully one day we might be able to exercise our freedom of speech and have euthanasia.
Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap! |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|
Sneakattack 

Posts: 1054
|
Posted: 02:37PM Dec 27, 2011 |
|
1/6 (1.3 billion) of the world's population lives in China.
Another 1/6 (1.1 billion) lives in India.
So the other 2/3 of people are spread all around the planet. If we play our cards right, we'll be ok. Those two countries are going to have the most problems with food, crime and people altogether.
The only problem with having seven billion people is that if there's a famine then there'll be total chaos.
What are you looking at? |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
Visit Wiki
|
snappytom

Posts: 4351
|
Posted: 07:53AM Jan 23, 2012 |
|
Wonder what it is now!
Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap! |
| Back to Top |
View Profile
Send PM
|