Brain Teasers
Brain Teasers Trivia Mentalrobics Games Community
Personal Links
Your Friends
Your Watchlist
Public Forums
Games
Writing Teasers
Teaser Answers
Ask a Question
The Human Mind
Trivia and Quizzes
New? Start Here!

General Discussion
Entertainment
Sports
Current Events

Announcements
Bugs & Requests

Subscribers
High Scorers
Moderators
High Karma
Debate
Grownups
More Community
Newsgroups
Wiki
Teaser Comments
Trivia Comments

User Rankings
Search for User
Add to Google delicious Add to del.icio.us

More ways to get Braingle...
rss

Braingle Time
1:51 am

Public Forums >> Current Events >>


Forum Rules View Watchlist


World Population Hits 7 Billion

AuthorMessage
HarryPutter*ca

Posts: 2931

new Posted: 11:04AM Oct 31, 2011

The U.N.-declared landmark underscores the challenges faced by many countries in providing for the growing numbers of people on an already over stretched and crowded planet.
...
With the world's population more than doubling over the last half century, basics like food and water are under more strain than ever, say experts, and providing for an additional 2-3 billion people in the next 50 years is a serious worry.

Water usage is set to increase by 50 percent between 2007 and 2025 in developing nations, while food security remains a challenge with 925 million people going hungry.

To feed the two billion more mouths predicted by 2050, food production will have to increase by 70 percent, the U.N.'s Food and Agricultural Organisation says. But climate change may be the greatest impediment to meeting this target, say experts.

Growing numbers of people on earth is also resulting in rapid urbanisation, placing serious strains on towns and cities as migrants move from poor rural areas to richer urban centres.
...

reuters

So 7 billion...

How will we survive?


---This message was edited on 11:04AM Oct 31, 2011---

If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage)
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
caberetAus

We are Stardust!
Posts: 358


new Posted: 12:11PM Oct 31, 2011

7,000,000,000 is indeed a large number. Very large number when you consider that it's human beings that we're talking about. Critters that use massive amounts of natural materials. With oil becoming increasing scarce in the rather near future, things should get interesting.

Perhaps it's time to build solar photoelectric roads, start hanging up our clothes and generally living with less. Or more likely, it's business as usual until it's suddenly way too late...


"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
maybenotAus

Posts: 37

new Posted: 03:46PM Oct 31, 2011

Breathingearth.net

OKAY, so I'm aware that this site is only a simulation, but if anyone wants to look at it and the population hits 7bill, can you PLEASE try to get a screenshot and send it to me. I want it so bad for my junior year scrapbook.


Deception and perfection are wonderful traits, one will breed love, the other hate.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
HarryPutter*ca

Posts: 2931

new Posted: 06:35PM Nov 1, 2011

Thanks for the link mayb. Interesting site

The vast majority of the population growth comes from people who really shouldn't be having kids.


If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage)
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
shawneeo*us

Posts: 7951

new Posted: 08:06PM Nov 2, 2011

uh oh! Harry, that's a powder keg of a statement! But I'm not gonna touch it!

We have to either start doing all the things we know we should do, like research and development of Solar, other renewable energies, zero population growth, more planned cities with less cars and more mass transport, and so on and on... or, just like cab said, it will suddenly be too late... That's my belief on the matter. We know we can do all these things, we have the intelligence, but will we, as one human race, do it?


Life... can be so many things... how can anyone ever think they are RIGHT? HAhahahahahahaha!!!!!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
ShadowsAcamod

Posts: 4680

new Posted: 08:35PM Nov 2, 2011

HarryPutter wrote:
The vast majority of the population growth comes from people who really shouldn't be having kids.


I'm not saying that only educated people should have kids, but this is rather interesting. Take a look.


"Time's rushing by me like the wind / Gotta grab each moment that I can / 'Cause I'm never gonna feel like this again"
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
HarryPutter*ca

Posts: 2931

new Posted: 10:04PM Nov 2, 2011

Not only that, look at fertility rates Worldwide...


source

The impoverished countries are the ones with the highest fertility rates.


If you're interested in teaching or learning something, check out the Braingle Academy TB. Request link: http://tinyurl.com/q3zpgmz (still in the BETA stage)
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
Mathgeek007tca

Pi Guy
Posts: 1431


new Posted: 10:08AM Nov 3, 2011

Something is drastically wrong here...

Parents are supposed to "protect" their kids, but there's a real distinction between protection and unrealistically keeping children away from reality. - Life_Sucks --- One of my teasers was featured as the Teaser of the Day! :D Sept. 18 2011 :D YAY!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
spud*nz

Posts: 1135

new Posted: 11:39PM Nov 3, 2011

I agree there is something wrong there, most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids and then al of the poor countries are highlighted with at least 4-6 kids!!!
Random.


Visit my wiki and PM me a message for my Guestbook and you will be on my friends list A.S.A.P!!! :)
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
Steve1973Aus

Posts: 715

new Posted: 01:01AM Nov 4, 2011

spud wrote:
I agree there is something wrong there, most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids and then al of the poor countries are highlighted with at least 4-6 kids!!!
Random.


Not really. Most of the wealthy countries have 1-2 kids, who almost always survive; the poor countries who have 4-6 kids often have a mortality rate that's out the roof. If 2/3 of all children die before they become an adult, you need to give birth to 3-6 children to have 1 or 2 survivors to continue on the species.

Generally speaking, countries with a high birth rate are also countries with a high mortality rate, and with a lower life expectancy.


Like to chat? Share links? Don't want to be told, it's a No-No to do so? Then come join us in THE REAL GENERAL DISCUSSION talkbox -- where you can post with only the lightest of moderation.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
spud*nz

Posts: 1135

new Posted: 01:19AM Nov 4, 2011

That is a good point but the kids in the wealthy countries can actually be looked after having a good education, good pay and a good health where as in the poor countries the adults are having lots of kids, making it hard on them and then the kids aren't surviving, not getting a good education and can't get a good pay, but if they adults in the poor countries had fewer kids their kids would have a better chance of surviving and getting a better education.

Visit my wiki and PM me a message for my Guestbook and you will be on my friends list A.S.A.P!!! :)
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
LogicalRogerAus

Posts: 2444

new Posted: 02:05AM Nov 4, 2011

but if they adults in the poor countries had fewer kids their kids would have a better chance of surviving and getting a better education.
I don't know if that's true. In certain countries this may make sense, but in others where, as Steve has pointed out, there is a high mortality rate, it would not mean that that individual has better chances. More than not, this would just kill off families as if a family only has a few children they are more likely to all die by the odds than one lucky one survive.

Actually, compare Harry's chart with the following to show that birth rates isn't all there is to population. There are plenty that had lots of kids on Harry's map that have low populations on this one and vice versa:

World Population Map

While I do agree that people should not have multiple children unless they have the means to support them, I wouldn't want to deny people from doing so either. If we did that, then that might seem as if we were encouraging the wealthy to have an evolutionary leg up (as if they don't already have one in personal health). While it might seem better to have people who can support themselves, over time the wealthy children would likely become poorer as usual, due to the lack of monetary resources to support an elite majority. And if not, then that would just limit culture too much, in my opinion.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
caberetAus

We are Stardust!
Posts: 358


new Posted: 06:12AM Nov 4, 2011

It also takes money and resources to avoid pregnancy. If certain populations have little access to basics such as enough food, clean water and meds, odds are they don't have readily available contraceptives.

"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
snappytom*

Posts: 4351

new Posted: 01:05AM Nov 5, 2011

Humans interfere too much.

Let mother nature take care of things.


Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
caberetAus

We are Stardust!
Posts: 358


new Posted: 08:25AM Nov 5, 2011

snappytom wrote:
Humans interfere too much.

Let mother nature take care of things.
Following with what I think you're saying would mean that next time people are sick that they shouldn't go to the doctor? Broken arms shouldn't be set, pneumonia should be allowed to kill rather than be treated with antibiotics, etc? If so, I don't see that happening anywhere except where people lack the resources for treatment.

It sounds well and good to espouse ideals like letting mother nature/god/whatever be in charge, but when trouble hits us or our loved ones, we are going to interfere!


---This message was edited on 10:44AM Nov 5, 2011---

"I discovered I scream the same whether I'm about to be devoured by a Great White or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot." Axl Rose
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
snappytom*

Posts: 4351

new Posted: 11:38AM Nov 5, 2011

Not necessarily. There are living wills.
And hopefully one day we might be able to exercise our freedom of speech and have euthanasia.


Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    
SneakattackAus

Posts: 1054

new Posted: 02:37PM Dec 27, 2011

1/6 (1.3 billion) of the world's population lives in China.
Another 1/6 (1.1 billion) lives in India.

So the other 2/3 of people are spread all around the planet. If we play our cards right, we'll be ok. Those two countries are going to have the most problems with food, crime and people altogether.

The only problem with having seven billion people is that if there's a famine then there'll be total chaos.


What are you looking at?
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
snappytom*

Posts: 4351

new Posted: 07:53AM Jan 23, 2012

Wonder what it is now!

Snappy Snappy Snap..Snap Snap Snap Snap!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM    

 



Public Forums >> Current Events >>


! Access Restricted

You'll need to create an account and sign in before you can post messages.






Users in Chat : TanCW 

Online Now: 16 users and 414 guests

Copyright © 1999-2013 | Updates | FAQ | RSS | Widgets | Links | Green | Subscribe | Contact | Privacy | Conditions | Advertise

Custom Search





Sign In A Create a free account