The Werewolf Game
Game #2973: M.A.D.
This game is moderated by extremeblueness. Please read the rules and contact the moderator with any questions or concerns about this game.
This game finished in 9 rounds.
Round 2!
RFM
Players / Les Joueurs:
Allikat73126: Italy / Italie / æ„大利 / إيطاليا
Basketball_life: Egypt / Égypte / åŸƒåŠ / مصر
Cameron821: Pakistan / Pakistan / å·´åŸºæ–¯å¦ / باكستان
Genesect1356247: China / Chine / ä¸å›½ / الصين
GODTamIT: Kyrgyzstan / Kirghizistan / å‰å°”å‰æ–¯æ–¯å¦ / قرغيزستان
Hercules: Ukraine / Ukraine / 乌克兰 / أوكرانيا
iamsam4: Iran / Iran / 伊朗 / ايران
Iliketrains: Turkey / Turquie / 土耳其 / تركيا
JJPutz: Korea / Corée / æœé²œ / كوريا
lillyPad7891: Israel / Israël / 以色列 / إسرائيل
max318: Australia / Australie / 澳大利亚 / أستراليا
nerd101: UK / l'Angleterre / è”åˆçŽ‹å›½ / المملكة المتØدة
Olerex: France / France / 法国 / Ùرنسا
nidhogg: Germany / Allemagne / 德国 / ألمانيا
princess1: Belarus / Belarus / 白俄罗斯 / روسيا البيضاء
randomgenius: Syria / Syrie / å™åˆ©äºš / سوريا
themasterbrain: South Africa / Afrique du Sud / å—éž / جنوب Ø£Ùريقيا
Yggdrasil: India / Inde / å°åº¦ / الهند
hp2536: USA / Etats Unis / 美国 / الولايات المتØدة الأمريكية
dangerouspie101: Russia / Russie / 俄国 / РоÑÑÐ¸Ñ / روسيا
UN NEWS/LE JOURNAL D'ONU
The official newspaper for UN happenings! Le journal official pour les événements d'ONU!
Almost as if there's a reversal of cold war roles, the US and Russia were pitted against each other yesterday. Iran, Turkey and Belarus voted for the US, with everyone else voting for a single player. Could the aggressors be taking revenge by taking out Russia? Or were they just taking out the other country with the big guns? In other news, Russia talked a bit crazy in the meeting yesterday. Could that possibly be the reason for elimination? Could Russia possibly be one of the aggressors?
Si il y a un conflit comme une guerre froide renversé, les Etats Unis et la Russie ont eu contre les même hier. L'Iran, la Turquie, et le Belarus ont eu pour le detruirement des Etats Unis, et tous les autres ont eu pour un pays seul. Peuvent-les collaberateurs veulent vengeance? Ou ont-ils détruit elle simplement parce qu'elle a les armes? La Russie ont parlé fou hier. Est-ce que c'est la raison pour la destruction?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 18:12:46---
"People can just pretend quotes are from a famous person, you know."-Albert Einstein while working on his Fizzcombobulating Spectaculator
RFM
Players / Les Joueurs:
Allikat73126: Italy / Italie / æ„大利 / إيطاليا
Basketball_life: Egypt / Égypte / åŸƒåŠ / مصر
Cameron821: Pakistan / Pakistan / å·´åŸºæ–¯å¦ / باكستان
Genesect1356247: China / Chine / ä¸å›½ / الصين
GODTamIT: Kyrgyzstan / Kirghizistan / å‰å°”å‰æ–¯æ–¯å¦ / قرغيزستان
Hercules: Ukraine / Ukraine / 乌克兰 / أوكرانيا
iamsam4: Iran / Iran / 伊朗 / ايران
Iliketrains: Turkey / Turquie / 土耳其 / تركيا
JJPutz: Korea / Corée / æœé²œ / كوريا
lillyPad7891: Israel / Israël / 以色列 / إسرائيل
max318: Australia / Australie / 澳大利亚 / أستراليا
nerd101: UK / l'Angleterre / è”åˆçŽ‹å›½ / المملكة المتØدة
Olerex: France / France / 法国 / Ùرنسا
nidhogg: Germany / Allemagne / 德国 / ألمانيا
princess1: Belarus / Belarus / 白俄罗斯 / روسيا البيضاء
randomgenius: Syria / Syrie / å™åˆ©äºš / سوريا
themasterbrain: South Africa / Afrique du Sud / å—éž / جنوب Ø£Ùريقيا
Yggdrasil: India / Inde / å°åº¦ / الهند
hp2536: USA / Etats Unis / 美国 / الولايات المتØدة الأمريكية
dangerouspie101: Russia / Russie / 俄国 / РоÑÑÐ¸Ñ / روسيا
UN NEWS/LE JOURNAL D'ONU
The official newspaper for UN happenings! Le journal official pour les événements d'ONU!
Almost as if there's a reversal of cold war roles, the US and Russia were pitted against each other yesterday. Iran, Turkey and Belarus voted for the US, with everyone else voting for a single player. Could the aggressors be taking revenge by taking out Russia? Or were they just taking out the other country with the big guns? In other news, Russia talked a bit crazy in the meeting yesterday. Could that possibly be the reason for elimination? Could Russia possibly be one of the aggressors?
Si il y a un conflit comme une guerre froide renversé, les Etats Unis et la Russie ont eu contre les même hier. L'Iran, la Turquie, et le Belarus ont eu pour le detruirement des Etats Unis, et tous les autres ont eu pour un pays seul. Peuvent-les collaberateurs veulent vengeance? Ou ont-ils détruit elle simplement parce qu'elle a les armes? La Russie ont parlé fou hier. Est-ce que c'est la raison pour la destruction?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 18:12:46---
"People can just pretend quotes are from a famous person, you know."-Albert Einstein while working on his Fizzcombobulating Spectaculator
hey everyone! SPV for now.
Error 404: signature not found
Error 404: signature not found
I'll do the same for now, but I don't really understand how this helps us? Someone's going to be shot anyway whether we vote randomly or try to figure it out logically? So we might as well try and reason out what the best plan is
Like I say, I haven't played this game in an age so correct me if I'm wrong!
Like I say, I haven't played this game in an age so correct me if I'm wrong!
until someone sees something that is clearly wolfish it is pretty much random. So alot of the times the 1st wolf is accidental
SPV for now.
We are always sometimes monsters.
SPV for now.
We are always sometimes monsters.
But if we all vote randomly every round, nobody will be doing anything wolfish at all?
Eatings is a big thing. Who wants who out is the question. if you play enough you can tell who is a wolf by the eatings in genral.
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 10:06:04---
We are always sometimes monsters.
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 10:06:04---
We are always sometimes monsters.
I'm going to give a SPV for myself for now, but let's keep in mind that dangerouspie101 voted for JJPutz. JJPutz might be a wolf. We shouldn't jump to conclusions, and it's probably a red herring, but I'm keeping my eye on JJPutz for a while.
Greetings, fellow traveler.
Greetings, fellow traveler.
I've played this game about 40 times now, Hercules, do you seriously think I'm that stupid?
I'm voting basketball, as she's dp's irl (in real life) friend and new to the game, so she could quite possibly be a wolf in her first game and be lost :/ idk
I'm voting basketball, as she's dp's irl (in real life) friend and new to the game, so she could quite possibly be a wolf in her first game and be lost :/ idk
Hercules wrote:
So basically Ukraine wants to bomb itself
okieeeee doke
I'm going to give a SPV for myself for now.
So basically Ukraine wants to bomb itself
okieeeee doke
Sorry for the spam people but
nidhogg wrote:
In order to use their divination powers, the seer must vote. If everybody votes for the same person and the round ends before the seer can vote, then we lose a divination from the seer. So we all vote for somebody different so the seer has time to get on and vote.
Unless, of course, we know the seer died
nidhogg wrote:
I'll do the same for now, but I don't really understand how this helps us? Someone's going to be shot anyway whether we vote randomly or try to figure it out logically? So we might as well try and reason out what the best plan is
Like I say, I haven't played this game in an age so correct me if I'm wrong!
Like I say, I haven't played this game in an age so correct me if I'm wrong!
In order to use their divination powers, the seer must vote. If everybody votes for the same person and the round ends before the seer can vote, then we lose a divination from the seer. So we all vote for somebody different so the seer has time to get on and vote.
Unless, of course, we know the seer died
I guess for now I'll cast an "SPV", since JJ's post above makes sense...
But I've also noticed that Iliketrains has voted twice now without posting any justification- there could be a lot of reasons for this but it's a bit suspicious all the same? No solid evidence yet but like Hercules said- I'm keeping my eye on them!
But I've also noticed that Iliketrains has voted twice now without posting any justification- there could be a lot of reasons for this but it's a bit suspicious all the same? No solid evidence yet but like Hercules said- I'm keeping my eye on them!
Yggdrasil wrote:
Which one?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 11:20:42---
JJ's post above makes sense...
Which one?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 11:20:42---
JJPutz wrote:
The one how we give the seer time to vote and divine somebody
Yggdrasil wrote:
Which one?
JJ's post above makes sense...
Which one?
The one how we give the seer time to vote and divine somebody
JJPutz wrote:
It's better than gaining enemies by voting for others.
I'd change my vote if there was a chance I'd actually be bombed.
Greetings, fellow traveler.
Hercules wrote:
So basically Ukraine wants to bomb itself
okieeeee doke
I'm going to give a SPV for myself for now.
So basically Ukraine wants to bomb itself
okieeeee doke
It's better than gaining enemies by voting for others.
I'd change my vote if there was a chance I'd actually be bombed.
Greetings, fellow traveler.
It doesn't seem like we have a majority yet. I think I will hold off on voting for now. I'll check back later.
If you don't have a dream, how will your dream come true?
If you don't have a dream, how will your dream come true?
Post from Iliketrains deleted on 2013-10-06 20:59:57.
Iliketrains wrote:
How'd you do?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 16:17:47---
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
I just got back from a chess tournament!
How'd you do?
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 16:17:47---
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
JJPutz wrote:
Who knows? Best to stay on the safe side.
Besides, since I'd be bombed if I didn't, I changed my vote.
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 16:35:53---
Greetings, fellow traveler.
You won't make enemies...
Who knows? Best to stay on the safe side.
Besides, since I'd be bombed if I didn't, I changed my vote.
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 16:35:53---
Greetings, fellow traveler.
You know, I've heard that China's big on suicide bombings in 2050. /shot
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
guess which one of the people in this game is my sister.
Hint-1st letter i, 2nd letter a, 3rd letter m, 4th letter s, 5th letter a, 6th letter m, 7th letter (not really letter) 4.
Yes, my literal sister. we have the same mom and dad.
"People can just pretend quotes are from a famous person, you know."-Albert Einstein while working on his Fizzcombobulating Spectaculator
Hint-1st letter i, 2nd letter a, 3rd letter m, 4th letter s, 5th letter a, 6th letter m, 7th letter (not really letter) 4.
Yes, my literal sister. we have the same mom and dad.
"People can just pretend quotes are from a famous person, you know."-Albert Einstein while working on his Fizzcombobulating Spectaculator
Hm... In the journal, is the French publication by the same writer as the English publication? I've noticed a difference between the two....
Going for JJ under the idea of a SPV. As I understand, there should be one vote per person, so as to make it random but still have the vote in place.
Going for JJ under the idea of a SPV. As I understand, there should be one vote per person, so as to make it random but still have the vote in place.
Olerex wrote:
extremeblueness wrote in round 1:
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
Hm... In the journal, is the French publication by the same writer as the English publication? I've noticed a difference between the two....
extremeblueness wrote in round 1:
Discrepancies between translations will be intentional (however, use of these discrepancies will be near impossible unless you're fluent in French).
"Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
SPV for iliketrains for now. Would have come back sooner but the internet broke down
If you don't have a dream, how will your dream come true?
If you don't have a dream, how will your dream come true?
I like to choose random people if there is not enough evidence that people give
P.S. Korea is slightly suspicious, but there is not enough evidence to SPV him
P.P.S. I got 10th place out of 60 people
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 21:10:50---
P.S. Korea is slightly suspicious, but there is not enough evidence to SPV him
P.P.S. I got 10th place out of 60 people
---This message was edited on 2013-10-06 21:10:50---
lillyPad7891 wrote:
SPV for iliketrains for now. Would have come back sooner but the internet broke down
why haven't you SPV me yet
Well then I guess it's valid to cover them.
These are the French lines, as you'd guess.
I've only been through a bit of French, but this publication uses a nice amount of cognates. My translation is below.
"Could the collaborators want vengance? Or do they destroy her[US] because she has weapons? Russia had talked crazily yesterday. Is that the reason for the destruction[of America]?"
Notably, the last sentence of the English Publication is left out in the French Publication. The rest of the passages were nearly similar.
Now as for what this means. My first guess was that it was to imply that Russia was a wolf, but they were eaten, so no there. Next was that dangerouspie was the Seer, who is already gone. This is valid, I guess, but unlikely. It was stated that Russia was crazy, which, if they were the seer, would be odd because the seer is anything but crazy, right?
So here's what I'm thinking. Looking over yesterday's discussion, the media could mean that Dangerouspie was in the entirely wrong direction. We know that the English Publication is not a direct translation of the French (Or vice versa), so they both agreed that Russia was crazy. I'm guessing that JJ is safe, but that's how I'm reading the situation.
Peuvent-les collaberateurs veulent vengeance? Ou ont-ils détruit elle simplement parce qu'elle a les armes? La Russie ont parlé fou hier. Est-ce que c'est la raison pour la destruction?
These are the French lines, as you'd guess.
I've only been through a bit of French, but this publication uses a nice amount of cognates. My translation is below.
"Could the collaborators want vengance? Or do they destroy her[US] because she has weapons? Russia had talked crazily yesterday. Is that the reason for the destruction[of America]?"
Notably, the last sentence of the English Publication is left out in the French Publication. The rest of the passages were nearly similar.
Now as for what this means. My first guess was that it was to imply that Russia was a wolf, but they were eaten, so no there. Next was that dangerouspie was the Seer, who is already gone. This is valid, I guess, but unlikely. It was stated that Russia was crazy, which, if they were the seer, would be odd because the seer is anything but crazy, right?
So here's what I'm thinking. Looking over yesterday's discussion, the media could mean that Dangerouspie was in the entirely wrong direction. We know that the English Publication is not a direct translation of the French (Or vice versa), so they both agreed that Russia was crazy. I'm guessing that JJ is safe, but that's how I'm reading the situation.
I am planning to SPV Syria because I want to destroy my neighbors
Olerex wrote:
I'd say the paragraphs are almost exactly the same (the French is definitely an attempted translation from English) except for the missing last sentence- "Could Russia possibly be one of the aggressors?"
I'm not quite sure what this is implying either, but it could mean that Russia wasn't being aggressive, i.e. it wasn't getting involved in the fight which would mean JJ isn't one of the aggressors either- possibly meaning they're not a wolf?
Also, the wording is a little strange, like the sentence "les Etats Unis et la Russie ont eu contre les même hier. L'Iran, la Turquie, et le Belarus ont eu pour le detruirement des Etats Unis" where the use of the verb "avoir" sounds out of place but I can't think what that could mean. I have to rush away now anyway so we can go through this next day (hopefully with a new journal to analyse!)
Good luck everyone
---This message was edited on 2013-10-07 02:48:27---
Well then I guess it's valid to cover them.
I'd say the paragraphs are almost exactly the same (the French is definitely an attempted translation from English) except for the missing last sentence- "Could Russia possibly be one of the aggressors?"
I'm not quite sure what this is implying either, but it could mean that Russia wasn't being aggressive, i.e. it wasn't getting involved in the fight which would mean JJ isn't one of the aggressors either- possibly meaning they're not a wolf?
Also, the wording is a little strange, like the sentence "les Etats Unis et la Russie ont eu contre les même hier. L'Iran, la Turquie, et le Belarus ont eu pour le detruirement des Etats Unis" where the use of the verb "avoir" sounds out of place but I can't think what that could mean. I have to rush away now anyway so we can go through this next day (hopefully with a new journal to analyse!)
Good luck everyone
---This message was edited on 2013-10-07 02:48:27---
Post from extremeblueness deleted on 2013-10-07 21:15:57.
You cannot post messages in previous rounds.
Follow Braingle!