Brain Teasers
An Egg
A science teacher told his after school class, "Whoever can get this egg into this smaller glass bottle will win no homework for a week! The rules are: the egg has to go into the bottle in one piece, and you can't break the bottle. You can also use anything in the science lab. So, do we have any volunteers?"
A boy raised his hand and the teacher pointed at him. The boy took the egg and looked around the science lab for the things he could use. He saw some writing paper, a pack of matches, some vinegar, a sink, and the glass bottle. By the end of the after school class, the boy had gotten the egg into the smaller bottle.
How did he do it?
Note that, without doing anything to the egg, the egg can't fit into the bottle.
A boy raised his hand and the teacher pointed at him. The boy took the egg and looked around the science lab for the things he could use. He saw some writing paper, a pack of matches, some vinegar, a sink, and the glass bottle. By the end of the after school class, the boy had gotten the egg into the smaller bottle.
How did he do it?
Note that, without doing anything to the egg, the egg can't fit into the bottle.
Answer
First, soak the egg in the vinegar which softens the shell without compromising the egg. Next, take some of the writing paper and shred it into pieces. Take the shredded pieces and put them into the glass bottle. Take a match and light a fire inside the bottle with the shredded paper. After, take the vinegar-soaked egg and put it on the top of the bottle so no oxygen can get into the bottle. The fire heats up the air inside the bottle and the air expands, pushing some of the air out. When the oxygen is used up, the fire dies and the air in the bottle begins to cool and contract. Since the egg is blocking the mouth, new air can't get in and a pressure difference is built up which eventually pushes the egg into the bottle. After a short while, the shell will harden and that's how the egg got into the bottle.Hide Answer Show Answer
What Next?
View a Similar Brain Teaser...
If you become a registered user you can vote on this brain teaser, keep track of which ones you have seen, and even make your own.
Solve a Puzzle
Comments
Surely by removing the shell, the egg is no longer in one piece? When the egg was given to the student, it still had on its shell and the puzzle was to get it in the bottle "in one piece". by removing the shell, the student has broken the one stipulation of the puzzle.
This teaser does not work because after taking off the shell, the egg is no longer one piece. Sorry, but you have to either follow your own rules or dont post a teaser.
GREAT ONE!
Well i didint get it but i did like it .
im sorry if the rules werent clear enough
The rules were very clear, the egg must remain in "one piece", and removing the shell takes away a piece of the egg, there fore breaking the rules of the challenge.
im sry mad-ade i just didnt know how to explain that without giving the answer away.
I understand that, but the teaser as it is now, is just wrong and impossible.
you didn't really think this one through enough
Just enjoy it for what it is people!!!
what, wrong you mean?
This is a well-known science demonstration, but it was always posed saying that you couldn't "break" the egg. So if you boil and peel it, you still have the egg, and if it's sucked into the bottle whole, you haven't "broken" it. The problem might have been better stated if that language had been used, but it's a good teaser just the same.
isn't the shell part of the egg? so if you remove the shell, you haven't actually got the full egg, only part of it.
Hey, maddie ... so if someone is having "ham and eggs" for breakfast, then they're really having only "ham and egs"??
Thought it was hard-boiled. Didn't get the vinegar part then. ...And I now officially have 250 teaser votes! w00t!
There seems to be a bit of confusion here. I don't see anywhere in the answer that the egg shell would be removed. By soaking the egg in vinegar the egg isn't dissolved, but rather becomes flexible such that the whole egg could change shape ie. fit into the shape of the neck of the glass bottle. After a while the shell rehardens. Once this has happened the egg is unharmed and unaltered from its original state. This is a pretty common highschool science experiment. Thus, this answer is correct and suitable for the question given.
Fishooky, I added the part about vinegar. The original teaser had the egg being boiled and the shell removed.
i knew that
i got the answer right !
This teaser still doesn't work. Nobody thought of this. What if the fire goes out? Since fire needs oxygen, without it, it will die. Or, if this egg gets into the bottle, won't it drop in and then hit one of the sides, thus cracking it?
The explanation is flawed; fire can't go an look for oxygen or selectively draw it in from the outside. The heat of the fire heats up the air in the bottle and it expands, the egg is positioned while the air is hot and expanded. When the air cools and contracts it usually would draw in air from outside but now draws in the egg due to pressure differences
This TEASER was a standard Science experiment when I was in 7th grade. Soo many years ago. Good teaser. To those who didn't get it, talk to an old person (someone who is at least 60.
It works, the description is just SLIGHTLY wrong.
The fire burns, heating and expanding the air, which pushes out around the egg. When the oxygen is used up the fire goes out, the air cools, contracting, and sucks the egg in with the fresh air.
The fire burns, heating and expanding the air, which pushes out around the egg. When the oxygen is used up the fire goes out, the air cools, contracting, and sucks the egg in with the fresh air.
Oct 10, 2008
You soak the egg in vinager it softens the shell so that the egg will contract enough to slip into the bottle!!!!!
Very good teaser. It sure has sparked a lot of controversy, got people thinking. Thanks for posting.
I did the soak-the-egg in vinegar thing as a kid, but it took days to soften the shell. And I don't see it being sucked into a bottle neck, but a good teaser nonetheless.
I've done this. If the egg is hard-boiled it actually happens very quickly. Don't pay any attention to the morons who talk about expanding air etc
This is something fun I could do with my kids!
I did this many years ago. It works.It is an old trick originally created by a scientist by the name of Oliver Dorndofer.
Science Doesn't Suck!!! No where is there any "sucking" activity. Technically there isn't any sucking anywhere in nature because you can't have negative absolute pressure.
As people have stated the heated air expands and some of it escapes into the atmosphere. When the air cools, it contracts and creates a lower pressure in the bottle. The air in the bottle is still pushing on the egg, just not as hard as the atmospheric air. The egg feels the difference in pressure and is pushed (not sucked) into the bottle.
As people have stated the heated air expands and some of it escapes into the atmosphere. When the air cools, it contracts and creates a lower pressure in the bottle. The air in the bottle is still pushing on the egg, just not as hard as the atmospheric air. The egg feels the difference in pressure and is pushed (not sucked) into the bottle.
I am soooo not a scientist!!!!
This was a good one. I guessed the vinegar part right. And I don't think the rules were flawed. The shell was never removed, it was just softened by the vinegar. Good One!!!!!
"As people have stated the heated air expands and some of it escapes into the atmosphere. When the air cools, it contracts and creates a lower pressure in the bottle. The air in the bottle is still pushing on the egg, just not as hard as the atmospheric air. The egg feels the difference in pressure and is pushed (not sucked) into the bottle."
That explanation SUCKS !
That explanation SUCKS !
A great experiment! I seem to remember another that used vinegar, and the eggs turn into "rubber balls" you could bounce. Anyone else remember?
I'd heard this before, but I couldn't remember all of it. Good teaser!
I disagree with the first two comments. The egg's shell was never removed.
I disagree with the first two comments. The egg's shell was never removed.
I agree. Some of the comments were stupid! Did they READ the explanation???
Anyway, I must have heard it before, because it was vaguely familiar, but I couldn't exactly put it together.
I must send it to my grandsons to see if they can figure it out. They are 8 & 10.
Good one! Thanks!
Anyway, I must have heard it before, because it was vaguely familiar, but I couldn't exactly put it together.
I must send it to my grandsons to see if they can figure it out. They are 8 & 10.
Good one! Thanks!
Nice1!!!
FredS, in responce to your post, quote:
"I've done this. If the egg is hard-boiled it actually happens very quickly. Don't pay any attention to the morons who talk about expanding air etc" - FredS
Well the "morons" as you call them who are talking about expanding air happen to be correct. Fire does not seek to draw oxygen from outside. Also, the process consuming oxygen (the fire) is also producing the products of combustion at an equal rate. So there is no change in the air mass because of the combustion process inside the bottle. The result of the egg being drawn in is caused solely by the expansion/contraction; heating/cooling of air inside the bottle.
If you have actually done this experiment as you say, you should have noticed that the egg was drawn in some time AFTER the fire went out! Any "moron" should have then realized it has nothing to do with burnt up oxygen, but rather outside air pressure pushing the egg into the low air pressure bottle.
"I've done this. If the egg is hard-boiled it actually happens very quickly. Don't pay any attention to the morons who talk about expanding air etc" - FredS
Well the "morons" as you call them who are talking about expanding air happen to be correct. Fire does not seek to draw oxygen from outside. Also, the process consuming oxygen (the fire) is also producing the products of combustion at an equal rate. So there is no change in the air mass because of the combustion process inside the bottle. The result of the egg being drawn in is caused solely by the expansion/contraction; heating/cooling of air inside the bottle.
If you have actually done this experiment as you say, you should have noticed that the egg was drawn in some time AFTER the fire went out! Any "moron" should have then realized it has nothing to do with burnt up oxygen, but rather outside air pressure pushing the egg into the low air pressure bottle.
Wow! I never thought that my teaser would be so popular. Thanks for all the comments!
To stem the tide of argument -- remember, if you will, that force is relative. Depending on your point of reference, the inside of the bottle can be sucking in OR the air outside can be pushing.
As for the difference between expansion/contraction and hot/cold -- the temperature causes the expansion/contraction so, technically, either answer is correct on that as well.
Ain't science grand?
As for the difference between expansion/contraction and hot/cold -- the temperature causes the expansion/contraction so, technically, either answer is correct on that as well.
Ain't science grand?
yes I agree kench. The point Im making is the assumption that oxygen molecules being used up by the fire is creating the vacuum is false. The oxygen being "burnt up" is being replaced with products from the combustion at the same rate. The air's mass or total number of molecules is not being "burned up". Instead some of it is pushed out of the bottle from the heating and resultant expansion of air as described in many posts above. And only AFTER the the fire goes out does the air cool and contract to create the vacuum if you will to, ok, suck the egg in. Im not contending the use of "suck" or "push" to be terms more or less correct than another. But the heating/expansion and cooling/contraction of air each occur prescisely in order for this to work and the theory of oxygen being burnt to creat a vacuum is just plain wrong.
I knew it had something to do with all three stated objects. Good Teaser.
Got the answer easily, but what a lot of confusion in some of the posts. Oh,well.....good teaser.
Thanks for a great, stimulating teaser. I've seen this done a few times with a peeled, hard-boiled egg. But the vinegar-softened shell is a new twist to me. Wlmahne's explanation of why it works is correct.
I remember this from science class many years ago, and I think it was hard-boiled with no shell. I don't remember anything about soaking it in vinegar.
Wow i really wanna try that now!
I though that he broke the egg, but put in only one piece (it had to be in one piece), but I guess that wouldn't work, since it would still be in more than one piece (outside of the bottle).
I can't understand why people don't read all the posts before commenting on a particular one! Initially, the answer was given as the egg was boiled, an incorrect answer, and later changed to the present vinegar method. I thought this was hard! But fun!!
Apr 19, 2011
dear idiots trying to be smart by saying it isn't possible because he removed the shell....where does it say he removed the shell, he soaked it in vinegar to soften the shell, never removed it, you are all idiots. take the time to read closely.
lol, read the earlier comments, you will see the original teaser had the egg boiled and the shell removed, I altered the teaser to add the vinegar soaking, thus enabling the entire egg to enter the bottle.
Not that the people that posted the earlier comments will see this since it was posted years ago, but l liked this teaser. Having done the egg-in-vinegar experiment I completely understand the concept behind it. Perhaps those who don't get it, should try it. Makes perfect sense to me and works well.
BTW I'm not old. l0l
BTW I'm not old. l0l
Aug 04, 2011
The vinegar dissolves the calcium carbonate content of the shell. I imagine this would take quite a long time and, technically, would be destroying part of the egg. But a good teaser!
This one is as old as the hills. I saw it many years ago so knew the answer. Any new ones anybody?
This teaser HAS been around a long time - and some people have responded to this one several times THIS YEAR. This is a good teaser, but enough is enough GO Detroit Tigers - and I hope it stops raining in Texas so we can play games #2 in the ALCS!! and HI, friends!
Great teaser!
All this time and no one thought to submit a correction? OK, I guess I will.
AWOR. This is so old, it's about we put that egg somewhere else. A to G&S
To the comments stating that the answer said to remove the shell -- the answer says to soften the shell by soaking it in vinegar. You do not remove the shell.
My Mother taught us how to do this with a hardboiled egg more than 50 years ago. We used a quart or gallon glass milk jug. The opening is just slightly smaller than an egg. We would light a piece of newspaper and drop it burning into the bottle then set the egg on top. When the fire has consumed all the oxygen and is extinguished it creates a vaccuum. The egg is then sucked into the bottle with an audible "POP" I used it for a science fair when I was probably 8 or 9 yrs. old.
The original teaser should have just started with a hardboiled egg and avoided all the controversy. I'm guessing that the original poster had never actually done it.
The original teaser should have just started with a hardboiled egg and avoided all the controversy. I'm guessing that the original poster had never actually done it.
Another way to get the egg into the bottle without breaking the bottle. Is to heat the neck of the bottle to the point where you can reshape the opening large enough for the egg to fit through.
Lol DSJT.
That's funny.
That's funny.
Oldie, but goodie. Just a little too easy. Hi G, Hi K.
the vacuum must be very strong...it doesn't work every time ...i've tried it
It is an oldie and it does work and read the teaser correctly and stop the arguments. Enough is enough already! Sheesh!
In the back of my trivia clogged brain, I remembered something about fire and egg and bottle, but I had forgotten the vinegar part.
Interesting science project. And wild comments!!
Will someone please fix this explanation? Its totally wrong! I can't edit the explanation, probably because this is a new account.
Several people commented on the correct explanation way back in 2008, but here is is, 6 years later, and still wrong.
The egg is NOT pulled in because the fire is trying to pull in oxygen.
The air expands when hot, after the fire goes out it contracts creating a local low pressure area which pulls the egg into the bottle.
The "pulling in oxygen" explanation is wrong on so many levels. This touches on diffusion, which would not push the egg back in. Further, O2 is burned to produce CO2, so its not like there is a loss of total gas through the combustion.
Several people commented on the correct explanation way back in 2008, but here is is, 6 years later, and still wrong.
The egg is NOT pulled in because the fire is trying to pull in oxygen.
The air expands when hot, after the fire goes out it contracts creating a local low pressure area which pulls the egg into the bottle.
The "pulling in oxygen" explanation is wrong on so many levels. This touches on diffusion, which would not push the egg back in. Further, O2 is burned to produce CO2, so its not like there is a loss of total gas through the combustion.
Pretty neat idea that I unfortunately have never seen. I think I may go home and give it a try!
I have seen this done with an hard boiled egg, but I never heard of this vinegar and egg experiment. This teaser certainly crated quite a bit of controversy!
I have seen this done with an hard boiled egg, but I never heard of this vinegar and egg experiment. This teaser certainly crated quite a bit of controversy!
Saw this on YOUTUBE! HAHAHAHA
To post a comment, please create an account and sign in.
Follow Braingle!