The Werewolf Game
Game #2830: Rome: The great battle
This game is moderated by wyse. Please read the rules and contact the moderator with any questions or concerns about this game.
This game finished in 5 rounds.
Doubt there is a need to RFM. We will be lucky to hear from him at all this game. No matter really, WWG can easily be played with no mod. I've played in a few games with no mod or a mod who takes very little interest in the game. IT still works fine, Really it is no different than playing in a blind moderated game.
Will place a SPV for LanceKolaski
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
Will place a SPV for LanceKolaski
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
SPV voting for Camillee.
We just won't get any guidance the
Anyways the game goes on...btw there are 2 wolves in this game right?
Anyways the game goes on...btw there are 2 wolves in this game right?
10 player game - 2 wolves
15 player game - 3 wolves
20 player game - 4 wolves.
I knew when I signed up, we'd get no mod help. But was hoping there'd be more player involvement.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
15 player game - 3 wolves
20 player game - 4 wolves.
I knew when I signed up, we'd get no mod help. But was hoping there'd be more player involvement.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
HABS2933 wrote:
I hope our Seer is active. I'll go place a SPV on someone who hasn't been voted for yet.
"An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is an adventure wrongly considered." - Chesterton
...WWG can easily be played with no mod. I've played in a few games with no mod or a mod who takes very little interest in the game. IT still works fine, Really it is no different than playing in a blind moderated game.
Yep. We'll be fine. We could try the talkbox route again (using a TB and a player mod to keep track of wolf kills etc) but since it's such a short game, we may not need it.I hope our Seer is active. I'll go place a SPV on someone who hasn't been voted for yet.
"An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is an adventure wrongly considered." - Chesterton
Elios wrote:
I've never played in a game that does that, I've monitored one out of curiosity but don't really see the point. Lots of moderators don't tell you who you've killed each round. And for the player moderator thing to work, requires the HONEST cooperation of ALL players in the game. If one or more of the players chooses not to PM their identity to the moderator, then we are still flying blind anyway.
It is up to the others though, I will go along with the majority on it, but so far it looks like most of our players are MIA anyway.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
We could try the talkbox route again (using a TB and a player mod to keep track of wolf kills etc.
I've never played in a game that does that, I've monitored one out of curiosity but don't really see the point. Lots of moderators don't tell you who you've killed each round. And for the player moderator thing to work, requires the HONEST cooperation of ALL players in the game. If one or more of the players chooses not to PM their identity to the moderator, then we are still flying blind anyway.
It is up to the others though, I will go along with the majority on it, but so far it looks like most of our players are MIA anyway.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
spv. i will read the posts and catch up in a while
Ë™Çızzı(p) ¿y ahora? the new refrigerator came. If you need me, i will be playing in the box.
Ë™Çızzı(p) ¿y ahora? the new refrigerator came. If you need me, i will be playing in the box.
Most know my early strategem: get rid of inactives.
Edit: so much for my strategy. It appears that I am the most inactive. Ouch. There is one person who has not been on braingle today. Now I could be like everyone else and vote for somebody nobody has voted for yet, called the seer protection vote. My only problem with that is that the computer will pick who gets shot and the computer will not shoot a wolf at random, particularly in the first round. I want a little more control than that. Sorry Ricci
---This message was edited on 2012-12-29 23:58:42---
God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night.
Edit: so much for my strategy. It appears that I am the most inactive. Ouch. There is one person who has not been on braingle today. Now I could be like everyone else and vote for somebody nobody has voted for yet, called the seer protection vote. My only problem with that is that the computer will pick who gets shot and the computer will not shoot a wolf at random, particularly in the first round. I want a little more control than that. Sorry Ricci
---This message was edited on 2012-12-29 23:58:42---
God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night.
In that case, I will change my vote to jpost for being so bold as to go for Ricci without any reason other than to have "control". In my experience in playing this game, werewolves have a much higher tendency to be bold about their voting.
jpost wrote:
The only problem I have with trying to use Log Ins as a determining factor is that they determine very little. As you said EVERYONE has been on the site, yet only a few have bothered to vote or even post. Being active on the site and in the are two totally different things.
IT is only 7:30am and everyone has either been already today or was on yesterday. So this does not help at all. HOWEVER tere are players not involved in the game at all.
4wheels
braingle01
Ricci_d and
Yuffie
If we are going to "get rid of inactives" one of them would be the way to go. Changed my vote to the inactive Ricci_d.
---This message was edited on 2012-12-30 08:23:26---
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
It appears that I am the most inactive. Ouch. There is one person who has not been on braingle today.
The only problem I have with trying to use Log Ins as a determining factor is that they determine very little. As you said EVERYONE has been on the site, yet only a few have bothered to vote or even post. Being active on the site and in the are two totally different things.
IT is only 7:30am and everyone has either been already today or was on yesterday. So this does not help at all. HOWEVER tere are players not involved in the game at all.
4wheels
braingle01
Ricci_d and
Yuffie
If we are going to "get rid of inactives" one of them would be the way to go. Changed my vote to the inactive Ricci_d.
---This message was edited on 2012-12-30 08:23:26---
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
Braingle01 has been on since my original post above (at about 7:30 EST) and voted, but has yet to post. This always strikes me as odd. If you have time to vote, you have time to explain your vote.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
Maybe the dog only brings the ball back because he thinks you like throwing it.
You cannot post messages in previous rounds.
Follow Braingle!