The Werewolf Game
Game #844: Werewolf Game - normal werewolf
This game is moderated by King_of_Smart. Please read the rules and contact the moderator with any questions or concerns about this game.
This game finished in 8 rounds.
Ok, well since uhh was eaten, I was at least right about not shooting him!
He wanted to go for dancerchick last round and was eaten, that is all I have right now as to who to vote for. I don't know if that was just the wolves being smart thinking that we were going to go for dancerchick then, or if they wanted to eat someone who was suspcious of them.
He wanted to go for dancerchick last round and was eaten, that is all I have right now as to who to vote for. I don't know if that was just the wolves being smart thinking that we were going to go for dancerchick then, or if they wanted to eat someone who was suspcious of them.
Well, if uhhh wanted to go for dancerchick, then that just adds to my feelings of her being a wolf. She voted for rosiepie last round, who was already proven to be human. I'm all for getting inactives out of the game if there's a possibility they could be wolves, but not if we know for sure they are human. Just helps the wolves win that way. I'm not logging a vote just yet though. We have 2 days, and I don't want to rush things.
Well, I have been sick and I can tell you now, I'm not a wolf, if I was one, I would at least eat the talkative ppl. I ALWAYS do that when I'm a wolf. But whatever.
I'm voting dancerchick.
gotta put your heart on the line, if you wanna make it right, you've got to reach out and try, gotta put your heart on the line, if you wanna get it right, gotta put it all on the line.
gotta put your heart on the line, if you wanna make it right, you've got to reach out and try, gotta put your heart on the line, if you wanna get it right, gotta put it all on the line.
nice info to have for future games (if you're not just trying to get out getting shot this time). Thanks! LOL! Still haven't seen much of anything to change my mind. Haven't heard much from mouseprincess since being called on shooting proven humans. Trying to lay low or just not been around? I think I'll go ahead and put my vote for dancerchick for now, in case I don't get back to the game before end of round. I should, but ya never know.
It seems like most people don't like to post in this game besides me and dreamlvr? I am studying for exams even and am still posting multiple times per round.
Please, we need other peoples input on who to shoot, the people are getting smaller, which means that we are getting closer to losing. If we haven't shot a wolf yet, obviously we need to take a random vote round and just go for anyone we want. I am starting to think that dreamlvr is a wolf, I know that I am usually eaten in games for over-talking things, but some people like Smeraldina and in this case dreamlvr like to keep the active people around to make it seem like they are human.
For now, my vote is going to go at dreamlvr, it might seem like bad logic to others, but this happens in a lot of games, and I am not completely sure about dancerchick, I knew that I shouldn't have said anything about it, because I really don't know if I should base my vote off of who is eaten.
Please, we need other peoples input on who to shoot, the people are getting smaller, which means that we are getting closer to losing. If we haven't shot a wolf yet, obviously we need to take a random vote round and just go for anyone we want. I am starting to think that dreamlvr is a wolf, I know that I am usually eaten in games for over-talking things, but some people like Smeraldina and in this case dreamlvr like to keep the active people around to make it seem like they are human.
For now, my vote is going to go at dreamlvr, it might seem like bad logic to others, but this happens in a lot of games, and I am not completely sure about dancerchick, I knew that I shouldn't have said anything about it, because I really don't know if I should base my vote off of who is eaten.
But soccerguy, I'm glad the wolves haven't eaten you yet. Can you imagine how slow this game would be with nobody else posting?? You can vote for me if you like, but I really am a human. I even defended uhhh when I was feeling he wasn't a wolf. I do agree that the wolves could totally be setting us up trying to get us to shoot someone based on who they ate. But I still find it suspicious that dancerchick and mouseprincess have tried on multiple occassions to shoot players that we have proven human under the guise of getting rid of inactives. Just think if we'd gotten rid of the 2 people we know are inactive humans, we'd be down to 8 humans and 4 wolves (assuming we didn't get a wolf last round). If we did shoot a wolf last round, would be 9 humans and 3 wolves. Still not very good odds if you ask me. I'm keeping my vote where it is for now.
well, i would much prefer to shoot dancerchick... her excuse doesn't seem very good, and she contradicted herself by voting for rosiepie who did not post at all last round, and it doesn't matter if you're sick, i would think if you could get on to vote you could at least post something?
Not if you're are asleep for a week and can't get on much. I try to get on every day when I'm sick but can't post every time. But I guess humans will lose this game since you are going to shoot me. Gonna lose a human. Your loss.
Well, Dancer, you've been on to post twice now, and still haven't given us any info as to who you think we should shoot. You've been too busy defending yourself. Give us something to take the focus off yourself then. And you never expained why you voted for rosiepie when we knew she was human. That would go a long way to convince us (if your explanation was plausible).
Right now, dancerchick seems to be the best choice to vote for. We cannot assume that because someone is inactive they are a wolf. We have been led by dancerchick and mouseprincess to eliminate humans based on that logic.
I haven't been near a computer for a few days ( well, actually its only been like 2 ) Reading all these posts, it seems that dancer is a bit suspicious, but I think I agree w/ soccerguy and vote for dreamlvr.
Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths, /Creations of the mind who just don't exist./ Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride./With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.
Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths, /Creations of the mind who just don't exist./ Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride./With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.
Mouseprincess, what about soccerguy's post did you agree with? I think it's rather convenient that you can just say "I agree" and vote without backing it up. You state dancer is suspicious based on posts, but vote for me instead. What do you think makes me suspicious? Share your thoughts please. It helps us all. (well not me if everyone agrees with you i'll be shot, but at least we'll be getting somewhere).
Isn't also kind of ironic that I suspect mouseprincess of being a wolf and she votes for me. Protecting dancerchick perhaps? Not sure.
Isn't also kind of ironic that I suspect mouseprincess of being a wolf and she votes for me. Protecting dancerchick perhaps? Not sure.
what about soccerguy's post did you agree with?
Pretty much all of it, actually.
I think it's rather convenient that you can just say "I agree" and vote without backing it up.
Well, I figured that you'd refer to what the person I agree with has said(typed), and why is it convenient?
You state dancer is suspicious based on posts, but vote for me instead.
Did we not just go through this? I think she is pretty suspicious, but I agree with soccerguy. I find you more likely to be a wolf. I agree with his logic, it does make sense.
What do you think makes me suspicious?
You are one of the first to post, you are the first to accuse and generally start the bandwagon almost everyone jumps on. KOS, last round, gave the hint that one wolf is active, the others not so active. You are very active(not a bad thing per say, games w/ active people are usually more fun). Also, a not as active person, like dancerchick who says they've been sick, and hasn't been longing in as much, really couldn't be a wolf, could they?
Isn't also kind of ironic that I suspect mouseprincess of being a wolf and she votes for me. Protecting dancerchick perhaps? Not sure.
Not really, I've had 2 or 3 rounds to vote for you, since you first 'suspected' me. I haven't voted for you till now, so the irony isn't really there. And no I am not protecting dancerchick, b/c I am not a wolf. Believe me or not, its your decision.
Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths, /Creations of the mind who just don't exist./ Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride./With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.
I am voting mouseprincess cause well, like ^^dreamy said it is a lot easier to just agree with someone... i do think dancer is suspicious
but than you too, are agreeing with someone......so that makes tons of sense
Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths, /Creations of the mind who just don't exist./ Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride./With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.
Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths, /Creations of the mind who just don't exist./ Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride./With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.
mouseprincess wrote:
Is it my fault that people choose to vote the way I do. They find my logic plausible. Just as you find soccer's plausible. By your reasoning, then soccer should be a wolf too. Dancer saying she's been sick has nothing to do with whether or not she's a wolf. A) she's been on to vote and post so pretty much not a valid point, and B) Just because 1 wolf is active doesn't mean they all are. It also doesn't mean that 3 are inactive either. As for your having 2 or 3 rounds to vote for me since I first suspected you...1) that wouldn't be wise, 2) by your own admission you haven't been on in a few days so you could not have voted for me. Again your reasoning is flawed. Most importantly, like dancerchick, you have still failed to explain why you would willingly shoot players that have been proven human just because they are inactive. This action only helps wolves, hence my suspecting you AND dancerchick. You keep trying to point the finger at me, but refuse to answer that simple question. It just goes to further my suspicion of you both.
mouseprincess wrote:
Pretty much all of it, actually.
Well, I figured that you'd refer to what the person I agree with has said(typed), and why is it convenient? It's convenient to say "I agree" and not back it up with your own reasoning. It keeps you from saying anything that could be used against you and pretty much keeps you under the radar.
---This message was edited on 2008-06-08 19:40:41---
You are one of the first to post, you are the first to accuse and generally start the bandwagon almost everyone jumps on. KOS, last round, gave the hint that one wolf is active, the others not so active. You are very active(not a bad thing per say, games w/ active people are usually more fun). Also, a not as active person, like dancerchick who says they've been sick, and hasn't been longing in as much, really couldn't be a wolf, could they?
Not really, I've had 2 or 3 rounds to vote for you, since you first 'suspected' me. I haven't voted for you till now, so the irony isn't really there. And no I am not protecting dancerchick, b/c I am not a wolf. Believe me or not, its your decision.
Isn't also kind of ironic that I suspect mouseprincess of being a wolf and she votes for me. Protecting dancerchick perhaps? Not sure.
Not really, I've had 2 or 3 rounds to vote for you, since you first 'suspected' me. I haven't voted for you till now, so the irony isn't really there. And no I am not protecting dancerchick, b/c I am not a wolf. Believe me or not, its your decision.
Is it my fault that people choose to vote the way I do. They find my logic plausible. Just as you find soccer's plausible. By your reasoning, then soccer should be a wolf too. Dancer saying she's been sick has nothing to do with whether or not she's a wolf. A) she's been on to vote and post so pretty much not a valid point, and B) Just because 1 wolf is active doesn't mean they all are. It also doesn't mean that 3 are inactive either. As for your having 2 or 3 rounds to vote for me since I first suspected you...1) that wouldn't be wise, 2) by your own admission you haven't been on in a few days so you could not have voted for me. Again your reasoning is flawed. Most importantly, like dancerchick, you have still failed to explain why you would willingly shoot players that have been proven human just because they are inactive. This action only helps wolves, hence my suspecting you AND dancerchick. You keep trying to point the finger at me, but refuse to answer that simple question. It just goes to further my suspicion of you both.
mouseprincess wrote:
what about soccerguy's post did you agree with?
Pretty much all of it, actually.
I think it's rather convenient that you can just say "I agree" and vote without backing it up.
Well, I figured that you'd refer to what the person I agree with has said(typed), and why is it convenient?
---This message was edited on 2008-06-08 19:40:41---
You cannot post messages in previous rounds.
Follow Braingle!