Brain Teasers
Brain Teasers Trivia Mentalrobics Games Community
Personal Links
Your Friends
Your Watchlist
Public Forums
Games
Writing Teasers
Teaser Answers
Ask a Question
The Human Mind
Trivia and Quizzes
New? Start Here!

General Discussion
Entertainment
Sports
Current Events

Announcements
Bugs & Requests

Subscribers
High Scorers
Moderators
High Karma
Debate
Grownups
More Community
Newsgroups
Wiki
Teaser Comments
Trivia Comments

User Rankings
Search for User
Add to Google delicious Add to del.icio.us

More ways to get Braingle...
rss

Braingle Time
1:01 pm

Public Forums >> Current Events >>


Forum Rules View Watchlist Post Reply


Historic Supreme Court Ruling

AuthorMessage
celticheroAus

Posts: 804

new Posted: 05:30PM Jun 27, 2015

Gays and lesbians can now legally marry in all fifty states. Any thought, guys?

---This message was edited on 05:31PM Jun 27, 2015---

I'm just an ordinary average guy with nothing to lose.
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
LogicalRogerAus

Posts: 3020

new Posted: 10:10PM Jun 27, 2015

Sounds great. I hope those who oppose it don't change it to the backwards way it used to be. The only opposing argument I've heard that ever had any amount of clout on this issue was the idea that prejudiced priests would be forced into performing gay weddings. Even that is such a minor issue (it's not like you must always like your clients or their views) and I'm sure there are enough open-minded people that it won't ever be a big issue, just a shouting point.

People are seriously angry about this on ground of freedom of speech? What joke is this? I'd understand if the law entailed that no one could ever say they dislike gay marriages, but as long as they can do that, how are they losing freedom of speech? I don't like that churches get free taxes, but does that mean they are oppressing my freedom of speech too?

Kudos to those who want to marry and be happy. It won't ruin society in any way. If you dislike the ruling then you can always plant your nose back in your book and keep it there.


Want to play a 20 player game of Werewolf or Who's The Boss? Sign up for a tournament in the Game Forum!
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
bluegrasssAusmod

Perseverance
Posts: 5915


new Posted: 08:54AM Jun 28, 2015

Yes one question. Where I live it says only a husband (defined as a man) and wife (defined as a woman) can divorce. So according to SCOTUS they can get married, but here according to the State Law how will they get divorced. The SCOTUS failed to include this in their decision.


Edited for those who need help SCOTUS = Supreme Court of the United States.


---This message was edited on 08:57AM Jun 28, 2015---
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
RGW4Ausmod

Posts: 1583

new Posted: 09:23PM Jun 29, 2015

LR, you bring up a point that I am sure will be an issue, even though it shouldn't be. If a person has a conviction to believe that marriage is only between a man and a woman due to their religious beliefs, I believe they should be allowed to "dis-qualify" themselves from performing the marriage.

I married a Catholic in a Catholic church by a Catholic priest and I am definitely not Catholic. I did the necessary "classes" beforehand, and I did make the promise to raise my children Catholic. Ok, enough said on how I finally got to marry my wife some 37 years ago ... if I did not follow their rules, we could not have been married in the Catholic church, by my wife's uncle (who is a Monsignor in the Catholic Church, now retired).

I would not be surprised if this problem of finding someone to marry some of these folks does not come up now because they may feel they should be able to get married in any church of their choice. The church and state must be separate... that too is in the Constitution.

And just as a single point, someone who believes in the words of the Bible who feels that a marriage is to be between a man and a woman only, is following the words of the Bible... you may wish to call it prejudices, and I will not debate that here, but for some, it is a matter of conviction.

No debate mostly because if a debate starts, this topic will need to be moved to the debate forum.... )though discussions are fine. Mod RGW4

If a church does not recognize this "ruling" as something they wish to honor, then so be it. There are plenty of ordained ministers out there that can marry people and if the two who wish to be married feel strong enough, why should they try to make it an issue? Find the church that will accept your way of life, or just get married at city hall where no religious following is necessary.

You also make an interesting point Blue... but I am sure someone will point this out to them soon enough to get an amendment to their ruling???


---This message was edited on 09:34PM Jun 29, 2015---

A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new. -Albert Einstein-
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki
RGW4Ausmod

Posts: 1583

new Posted: 12:57AM Jun 30, 2015

I see that several states have already started to fight back... but the article goes on to say that most of their efforts will be for naught... the Supreme Court has spoke.

A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new. -Albert Einstein-
Back to Top View Profile     Send PM     Visit Wiki

 



Public Forums >> Current Events >>


! Access Restricted

You'll need to create an account and sign in before you can post messages.




Users in Chat : None 

Online Now: 11 users and 541 guests

Copyright © 1999-2014 | Updates | FAQ | RSS | Widgets | Links | Green | Subscribe | Contact | Privacy | Conditions | Advertise

Custom Search





Sign In A Create a free account