The Werewolf Game
Game #2913: Survivor (Alive and Kicking)
This game is moderated by Mitty44. Please read the rules and contact the moderator with any questions or concerns about this game.
This game finished in 10 rounds.
RFM, just incase
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
Sorry about not voting last round, I was out and about doing stuff with family and didn't have a chance to get back to my computer
I'm finding it eerily suspicious that everyone who was playing in my last game keeps getting eaten. I'm the only one left, aside from tuku, who was modding the game. It is probably just coincidence, but it is disconcerting.
So, we have one more inactive. I know some people are feeling the pressure to start really wolf hunting. I need to get out my notebook and take some notes as to who I'm feeling is acting suspicious. The only people left I have any insight into their playing style are jervis, tuku, and stewie. From what I know of them, I don't think they would have voted for people they find threatening, I think they prefer the thrill of going against people they feel are threats. Of course, that does not clear them, with 4 wolves, 1 hold out does not make that big of a difference.
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
So, we have one more inactive. I know some people are feeling the pressure to start really wolf hunting. I need to get out my notebook and take some notes as to who I'm feeling is acting suspicious. The only people left I have any insight into their playing style are jervis, tuku, and stewie. From what I know of them, I don't think they would have voted for people they find threatening, I think they prefer the thrill of going against people they feel are threats. Of course, that does not clear them, with 4 wolves, 1 hold out does not make that big of a difference.
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
Yeah I am in that majority mocha. But I think that goes without saying. I mean any veteran wwg player, would not vote for the people they find threatening to try and get on their good side. It's the old reverse psychology trick that has been around since the early days, classic tactics that still work wonders when you can pull them off.
That being said I need time to think and try and figure out who I would like to vote for this round. I shall be back a little later...
Stewie.
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." Carl Sagan
That being said I need time to think and try and figure out who I would like to vote for this round. I shall be back a little later...
Stewie.
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." Carl Sagan
Shoot, 4 wolves?? I really haven't played in a long time lol. That's even more concerning now.
I'm assuming night timed out again. So we can assume that Meleotta is a wolf, in saying that, I feel it's safe to look for others now and shoot her before we get to a 4-4 situation. Thoughts?
I'm assuming night timed out again. So we can assume that Meleotta is a wolf, in saying that, I feel it's safe to look for others now and shoot her before we get to a 4-4 situation. Thoughts?
If I'm doing it correctly, we should have 3 rounds left if all 4 wolves are still alive. I'm probably not going to be on tomorrow, because I might be going to the States, so I'll be voting within the next 5 hours or so.
Queen stays queen, adios!
Queen stays queen, adios!
Jervis, I would not assume that because night is timing out that we have an inactive wolf. A logical active wolf would know it is better to not vote at night than to clear a player. That being said, it only takes one inactive to force the nights to go full time, so it is quite possible you are correct also. Or, perhaps, Jervis, you are a wolf and want us to take one more round on an inactive you know to be human?
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
I suspect Jervis, so that is where my vote goes. I don't really have a reason, because it is really hard to explain what is in my head right now. BTW, I am back in Thailand now, so I will be active again unless something else happens. Here is a video link about our trip to malaysia.this link
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
Mocha, I was actually saying/meaning that we should be looking for another person as wolf. And that we can shoot Meleotta in a later round but before we get to a 4-4 situation (if there are 4 active wolves). I was not saying to shoot Meleotta now, even if we do suspect her as a wolf.
In saying that. I get a strong vibe that had I said it this way, you may have then pointed to me as a possible wolf protecting an inactive wolf, correct?
My rationale is:
1/ if Meleotta is a wolf, then we will be able to shoot her whenever we want, like I say, best before we get down to 10 people (if we shoot #10, #9 gets eaten and then there is 4-4 and game ends with wolves winning).
2/ if Meleotta is not a wolf, then the wolves have been given 3 rounds of free meals and at least 1 wolf is not voting until the last minute (or not voting at all). As such, if we go ahead now and continue to shoot the final inactive, we get that much closer to the possible 4-4.
Of course, this is worst case scenario, we may have shot an inactive wolf already, which will give us more time.
Just thinking this through a bit. If we do have 4 active wolves, or even 3, we need to be very careful about who we listen to. Yes, I could be a wolf trying to shift votes, but if my logic rings true, then you will know I am not.
kmrutledge - I would like to know why you are voting for me? Your suspicion has to come from somewhere.
---This message was edited on 2013-05-18 21:04:20---
In saying that. I get a strong vibe that had I said it this way, you may have then pointed to me as a possible wolf protecting an inactive wolf, correct?
My rationale is:
1/ if Meleotta is a wolf, then we will be able to shoot her whenever we want, like I say, best before we get down to 10 people (if we shoot #10, #9 gets eaten and then there is 4-4 and game ends with wolves winning).
2/ if Meleotta is not a wolf, then the wolves have been given 3 rounds of free meals and at least 1 wolf is not voting until the last minute (or not voting at all). As such, if we go ahead now and continue to shoot the final inactive, we get that much closer to the possible 4-4.
Of course, this is worst case scenario, we may have shot an inactive wolf already, which will give us more time.
Just thinking this through a bit. If we do have 4 active wolves, or even 3, we need to be very careful about who we listen to. Yes, I could be a wolf trying to shift votes, but if my logic rings true, then you will know I am not.
kmrutledge - I would like to know why you are voting for me? Your suspicion has to come from somewhere.
---This message was edited on 2013-05-18 21:04:20---
Jervis, the last line of my post was mostly joking. And you are probably right that I might have said the opposite had you said the opposite. At this point, I don't know what to think about you, but I'm certainly not aiming any guns at you yet. I know you well enough to know you are capable of pulling one over on us, and also that you are a valuable player that we will need if you are human.
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
At this point, I'm really not sure how to vote. We really need to get a wolf soon, to avoid getting it down to ten players. The major problem I've got is that since we have no mod, we can't tell if we've shot three wolves or zero wolves. My suspicions for potential wolves:
-gymboy09: often votes without posting, which is a common sign of a wolf
-Tomatoes: see my previous arguments.
-Jervis: you are coming off as highly defensive, but that could just be my interpretation.
-gymboy09: often votes without posting, which is a common sign of a wolf
-Tomatoes: see my previous arguments.
-Jervis: you are coming off as highly defensive, but that could just be my interpretation.
Mods don't have to post whether we killed a wolf. I know when I mod, I normally choose not to. This is just an olde-fashioned game Although, I do agree it would be useful. I don't have time to know, but I am hoping to look through the previous rounds tomorrow before I vote. I'll post my thoughts then.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
tukuwakatiki wrote:
I know they don't have to, but in nearly every game I've ever played they do.
Mods don't have to post whether we killed a wolf. I know when I mod, I normally choose not to. This is just an olde-fashioned game Although, I do agree it would be useful. I don't have time to know, but I am hoping to look through the previous rounds tomorrow before I vote. I'll post my thoughts then.
I know they don't have to, but in nearly every game I've ever played they do.
Yes Summer, I was a bit defensive because I've been voted for without a real reason, and I don't know if mocha was really joking or not *looks sideways at mocha*. I had to point out to everyone that what I said could be manipulated to show me as a possible wolf no matter what I said, and being framed is not pleasant.
For now, I am going to lock in a vote for mocha. (Sorry sweetness). I really feel like she was trying to plant a seed in everyone else's mind that I be furry with big ears!
For now, I am going to lock in a vote for mocha. (Sorry sweetness). I really feel like she was trying to plant a seed in everyone else's mind that I be furry with big ears!
Jervis is suspicious for leading to vote for an inactive.
Inactive #3 is suspicious because of the time outs.
Mocha is suspicious because of the anti-lead.
Hop on pop. Jervis it is.
Inactive #3 is suspicious because of the time outs.
Mocha is suspicious because of the anti-lead.
Hop on pop. Jervis it is.
Summer-Ktreva wrote:
The last game that I was in which had an inactive mod one of the wolves told their identity and told us when we shot another wolf, and none of the humans chose to shoot that wolf until the end if it came to it.
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
At this point, I'm really not sure how to vote. We really need to get a wolf soon, to avoid getting it down to ten players. The major problem I've got is that since we have no mod, we can't tell if we've shot three wolves or zero wolves. My suspicions for potential wolves:
-gymboy09: often votes without posting, which is a common sign of a wolf
-Tomatoes: see my previous arguments.
-Jervis: you are coming off as highly defensive, but that could just be my interpretation.
-gymboy09: often votes without posting, which is a common sign of a wolf
-Tomatoes: see my previous arguments.
-Jervis: you are coming off as highly defensive, but that could just be my interpretation.
The last game that I was in which had an inactive mod one of the wolves told their identity and told us when we shot another wolf, and none of the humans chose to shoot that wolf until the end if it came to it.
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
Here is the link to that game where a player (melody_pond) revealed her identity as a wolf and gave us clues and stuff. TWG #2860 Cool Werewolf Game
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
The faster I type in my password, the more secret agent-y I feel.
Ihmisen, again, not sure why things I have said are being misinterpreted here.
I have not led any of the inactive votes. And I have given reason why not to vote the last inactive this round. So confused.
I have not led any of the inactive votes. And I have given reason why not to vote the last inactive this round. So confused.
Not sure if/when I'll be able to get to my computer again before day ends, so I'm going to go ahead and vote. Voting for jervis, because of the people I think might be wolves, he is the most dangerous. Sorry
Wow, so I didn't intend to put jervis in the spotlight. And, jervis, feel free to vote for me if you feel you must. I don't take it personally.
Ihmisen, what do you mean by "anti-lead"? Am I now a lead repellant? Should serve me well in protecting myself from getting shot.
My opinion about not having ID's given is that there is no reason for them. They are a crutch to allow people to not really think about the game and that it makes the game too easy. I wish more mods would advertise at the beginning of the game that they are making an exception to the rules to allow them, rather than surprise the players by giving them... I would only sign up for games without ID's. So please, if you are a wolf, DO NOT give yourself up to do this. And if you are a human, DO NOT go out of your way to do this. It is going to require us to think a little harder, but that is how this game was designed, and how it was intended to be played.
Because I DO NOT think jervis warrants being shot at this time, I am going to go ahead and vote for our final inactive. I should have time tonight to get caught up on my notebook and will hopefully have a better idea of who I find suspicious next round. This round has given me several ideas though as to who is defensive, who is standing up for whom, and so on.
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
Ihmisen, what do you mean by "anti-lead"? Am I now a lead repellant? Should serve me well in protecting myself from getting shot.
My opinion about not having ID's given is that there is no reason for them. They are a crutch to allow people to not really think about the game and that it makes the game too easy. I wish more mods would advertise at the beginning of the game that they are making an exception to the rules to allow them, rather than surprise the players by giving them... I would only sign up for games without ID's. So please, if you are a wolf, DO NOT give yourself up to do this. And if you are a human, DO NOT go out of your way to do this. It is going to require us to think a little harder, but that is how this game was designed, and how it was intended to be played.
Because I DO NOT think jervis warrants being shot at this time, I am going to go ahead and vote for our final inactive. I should have time tonight to get caught up on my notebook and will hopefully have a better idea of who I find suspicious next round. This round has given me several ideas though as to who is defensive, who is standing up for whom, and so on.
"Wir müssen wissen, und wir werden wissen." -David Hilbert
Personally I don't think mocha or jervis are wolves, but that brings up the question of who is?
I am a little lost right now as to who could or could not be a wolf.
But I don't see any incriminating evidence on anyone right now. Other than playing styles and I \m a little rusty with most players here. So it's a difficult one for me.
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." Carl Sagan
I am a little lost right now as to who could or could not be a wolf.
But I don't see any incriminating evidence on anyone right now. Other than playing styles and I \m a little rusty with most players here. So it's a difficult one for me.
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." Carl Sagan
Quite interesting. A lot of active players means fun.
My last exam is on 21, so I'll be really regular after that.
For now, I will vote for the inactive as nights are being timed out so a wolf may be inactive.
Btw guys, I have been away from Braingle for long and I think I remember being a wolf only once. Can anyone tell me whether the wolves can see who the other wolves are voting for or not?
My last exam is on 21, so I'll be really regular after that.
For now, I will vote for the inactive as nights are being timed out so a wolf may be inactive.
Btw guys, I have been away from Braingle for long and I think I remember being a wolf only once. Can anyone tell me whether the wolves can see who the other wolves are voting for or not?
You cannot post messages in previous rounds.
Follow Braingle!